eValuator’s $31M Cash Impact Validated Via 835 Remittance Analysis

topics:

835 file

,

auditing

,

cash impact

,

pre-bill

Posted On :

OVERVIEW

After implementing eValuator, the client aimed to confirm its financial impact by analyzing 835 remittance data for inpatient claims in the calendar year 2023. A post-payment analysis comparing actual reimbursements with pre-billing predictions validated eValuator’s impact, demonstrating that correcting approximately 2,300 under-coded encounters increased cash for inpatient services by over $31 million.

CHALLENGES

  • Validate Pre-Bill Financial Projections
    Pre-bill projected reimbursements provided estimates of financial impact but not actual reimbursements across payors.
  • Quantify Bottom Line Impact
    Without actual reimbursement data, it was challenging to validate eValuator’s true bottom-line impact to the executive team.
  • Validate Coding Accuracy Improvements
    Actual reimbursement data from eValuator’s pre-billing coding changes was needed to verify coding accuracy improvements.

GOALS

  • Leverage 835 Remittance Data to Validate Pre-Bill Projections
    Compare actual reimbursement data using 835 remittance data with eValuator pre-billing predicted impacts to confirm the accuracy of projections.
  • Aggregate Actuals by Payor to Quantify Bottom Line Impact
    Quantify eValuator’s true impact on the organization’s financial performance and prove the return on investment to the executive team.
  • Validate Coding Accuracy for Potential Auditing Expansion
    Confirm coding accuracy improvement to make a case for potentially expanding the audit staff to further optimize cash capture.

OUTCOMES

  • Confirmed $31M Total Cash Impact
    Analysis shows eValuator optimized around 2,300 under-coded encounters, capturing $31 million in cash and averaging $14K per correction.
  • Actuals Exceeded Pre-Bill Projections
    The executive team concluded that actual financial impact exceeded eValuator’s pre-bill projections.
  • Cost Avoidance & Savings
    By identifying issues pre-bill, client avoided potential rebilling costs & contingency fees of 20–40%, saving $6–12million from the $31 million.